FAVUR

1 gate redo, 1 concierge debate and 1 scale readout

auto-assembled · drafted mechanically from this run's detected moments

Auto-assembled from the 3 sharpest detected moments of this run. None of them ever turned.

Or grab the whole reel as one image: composite.png · or as a looping animation: reel.webp

Animated reel: 1 gate redo, 1 concierge debate and 1 scale readout. Auto-assembled from the 3 sharpest detected moments of this run. None of them ever turned. 3 moment cards with source code and transcript excerpts from the run telemetry.
The animated reel - the cards plus source code and transcript excerpts from the run telemetry. The full-size cards follow below.
  1. At peak, 3 agents were mid-tool-call in the same second. One run, one job - and a headcount no single-agent tool can log. 150 agents were hired across 2 hours. A dedicated supervision lane spent 239 model calls doing nothing but checkups on the rest of the team.

    1/3 150 agents hired for one job - a headcount no single-agent tool can log.

  2. A quality gate said no - the same agent passed it 9 minutes later. Steps end at automated quality gates; work that misses the bar goes back to the agent that produced it, however long the redo takes. The develop agent failed its gate with 1 of 4 criteria met. 9 minutes later the same agent brought the work back, and the same gate passed it.

    2/3 A quality gate says no; the same agent redoes the work and the gate passes it.

  3. The concierge argued a product call for 2 rounds. A concierge agent wanders the repo full-time, second-guessing product quality nobody asked it to check. It opened a debate and worked through pros, cons and risks over 2 rounds, pushing back on its own first answer. It talked itself into an answer and moved on.

    3/3 The concierge debates a product call for 2 rounds.