FAVUR

1 rejected review, 3 penalties, 1 concierge debate and 1 scale readout

auto-assembled · drafted mechanically from this run's detected moments

Auto-assembled from the 6 sharpest detected moments of this run. 3 of 6 turned; the rest never did.

Or grab the whole reel as one image: composite.png · or as a looping animation: reel.webp

Animated reel: 1 rejected review, 3 penalties, 1 concierge debate and 1 scale readout. Auto-assembled from the 6 sharpest detected moments of this run. 3 of 6 turned; the rest never did. 6 moment cards with source code and transcript excerpts from the run telemetry.
The animated reel - the cards plus source code and transcript excerpts from the run telemetry. The full-size cards follow below.
  1. At peak, 2 agents were mid-tool-call in the same second. One run, one job - and a headcount no single-agent tool can log. 212 agents were hired across 4 hours. A dedicated supervision lane spent 338 model calls doing nothing but checkups on the rest of the team.

    1/6 212 agents hired for one job - a headcount no single-agent tool can log.

  2. Docked 10 merits for repeating the same document write without progress - earned back 5 by fixing it. Favur's orchestrator runs periodic checkups on every agent on the team, awarding merits for good work and demerits for bad habits. A checkup caught the develop agent repeating the same document write over and over without progress, costing it 10 merits - about a fifth of its standing. The agent corrected course and earned 5 merits back before the run ended.

    2/6 The develop agent is docked about a fifth of its standing. It climbed back.

  3. Docked 10 merits for repeating the same document write without progress - earned back 5 by fixing it. Favur's orchestrator runs periodic checkups on every agent on the team, awarding merits for good work and demerits for bad habits. A checkup caught the develop agent repeating the same document write over and over without progress, costing it 10 merits - about a fifth of its standing. The agent corrected course and earned 5 merits back before the run ended.

    3/6 The develop agent is docked about a fifth of its standing. It climbed back.

  4. Docked 10 merits for ignoring an explicit instruction - and never earned them back. Favur's orchestrator runs periodic checkups on every agent on the team, awarding merits for good work and demerits for bad habits. A checkup caught the develop agent ignoring an instruction it had been given in plain terms, costing it 10 merits - about a fifth of its standing. It never earned the standing back before the run ended.

    4/6 The develop agent is docked about a fifth of its standing for ignoring an explicit instruction. It never recovered.

  5. The reviewer held the work back over 5 critical and 5 high-severity problems - 3 edits later it passed. Before anything ships, a code-review agent on the same team grades its teammates' work. It required fixes before it would sign the change off - 5 critical and 5 high-severity problems in __init__.py and main.py. The team fixed it: 3 edits later, the review passed it.

    5/6 The review lands PASS WITH CHANGES: 5 CRITICAL and 5 HIGH findings. 3 edits later it passes.

  6. The concierge argued a product call for 1 round - and locked a rule. A concierge agent wanders the repo full-time, second-guessing product quality nobody asked it to check. It opened a debate and worked through pros, cons and risks over 1 round, pushing back on its own first answer. The debate ended in a locked rule the rest of the team now builds under.

    6/6 The concierge debates a product call for 1 rounds. A rule gets locked.