FAVUR

1 penalty, 1 gate redo, 1 retry loop, 1 commit that mattered, 1 art burst and 1 spend spike

auto-assembled · drafted mechanically from this run's detected moments

Auto-assembled from the 6 sharpest detected moments of this run. 1 of 6 turned; the rest never did.

Or grab the whole reel as one image: composite.png · or as a looping animation: reel.webp

Animated reel: 1 penalty, 1 gate redo, 1 retry loop, 1 commit that mattered, 1 art burst and 1 spend spike. Auto-assembled from the 6 sharpest detected moments of this run. 1 of 6 turned; the rest never did. 6 moment cards with source code and transcript excerpts from the run telemetry.
The animated reel - the cards plus source code and transcript excerpts from the run telemetry. The full-size cards follow below.
  1. The same command failed 5 times in 8 minutes - then passed. Agents run their own build and test commands, and in a team of agents the code can change under a command between runs. One agent ran the same command, `poetry run pytest --co`, 5 times over 8 minutes; every run failed. The command never changed - the code underneath it did: 11 file writes landed inside the loop window, and the next run passed.

    1/6 The same command fails 5 times; the code changes under it, and the next run passes.

  2. Docked 15 merits for burning time without progress - earned back 5 by fixing it. Favur's orchestrator runs periodic checkups on every agent on the team, awarding merits for good work and demerits for bad habits. A checkup caught the sprint-plan agent burning through exchange after exchange without making progress, costing it 15 merits - about a quarter of its standing. That dropped it into the warning tier. The agent corrected course and earned 5 merits back before the run ended.

    2/6 The sprint-plan agent is docked about a quarter of its standing for burning time without progress. It climbed back.

  3. A quality gate said no - the same agent passed it 67 minutes later. Steps end at automated quality gates; work that misses the bar goes back to the agent that produced it, however long the redo takes. The develop agent failed its gate with 0 of 4 criteria met. 67 minutes later the same agent brought the work back, and the same gate passed it.

    3/6 A quality gate says no; the same agent redoes the work and the gate passes it.

  4. One agent generated 6 images in under a minute. An agent can call an image model mid-run when the job needs art it cannot draw itself. The platform agent produced 6 generated images in under a minute, one after another. The set landed in the project as files - a coherent batch of assets built to order in one sitting.

    4/6 One agent generates 6 images in a single sitting.

  5. The run's priciest five minutes - 10.1 times a typical window. Every model call is metered, so a run's spend can be read window by window against its own baseline. For five minutes, 33 model requests from 6 agents landed at once - 10.1 times the run's typical five-minute spend. The burst bought something: the checkup agent finished its job.

    5/6 The priciest five minutes runs 10.1 times the typical window - 6 agents burning at once.

  6. 3 failing tests, one commit, 1014 passing. The suite runs after every change, so a failing run points straight at the commits that follow it. The suite came back with 3 failing tests. One code-touching commit landed, from the develop agent - the only change in the window. The suite ran green 58 minutes after the red run - 1014 passing, 12 of them new tests landing in the same window.

    6/6 3 failing tests, one commit, 1014 passing.